DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20223033
Published: 2022-11-23

Actual use puffing topography and mouth level exposure to aerosol and nicotine for an evolving series of electronic nicotine delivery systems

Krishna Prasad, Adam Gray, Lauren Edward

Abstract


Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have evolved substantially in the past 10 years from disposable “cig-a-likes” to rechargeable devices with refillable tanks or disposable cartridges. It is less clear whether users’ puffing behaviour and exposure to aerosol emissions has similarly altered. Here we evaluate changes in the puffing topography and mouth level exposure (MLE) of users to aerosol and nicotine for a series of commercially available ENDS. In five separate consumer studies conducted from 2014 to 2019, eight Vuse ENDS including cig-a-likes, tanks, pen- and pod-style e-cigarettes were evaluated among ENDS users (total n=221) for puff duration, puff volume, inter-puff interval and MLE to aerosol and nicotine. Puff volumes varied two-fold (35.7-84.8 ml) with the lowest volumes for early ENDS and highest volumes for more recent pod style and tank systems. The variation in puff duration across the devices was smaller (1.70-2.39 s), especially for the five most recent devices (2.13-2.39 s). MLE to aerosol (1.9-6.4 mg/puff) tended to increase with evolution of the ENDS. MLE to nicotine, which depends on the nicotine concentration of the e-liquid as well as device design, was also highest for more recent devices. These data indicate that evolving device characteristics, such as more powerful batteries and aerosolisation technology, influence user puffing topography and the values obtained from one product might not apply to others. Continuing to evaluate ENDS consumer behaviour is important to understand further the factors that affect users’ puffing topography and nicotine uptake from these products.


Keywords


ENDS, MLE, Aerosol, Vuse

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lik H. Electronic Atomization Cigarette. US Patent No. US 8393331 B2. 2013.

Margham J. Chemical composition of aerosol from an e-cigarette: A quantitative comparison with cigarette smoke. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016;29(10):1662-78.

Cunningham A, McAdam K, Thissen J, Digard H. The evolving e-cigarette: Comparative chemical analyses of e-cigarette vapor and cigarette smoke. Front Toxicol. 2020;2(7).

Belushkin M. Selected Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituent Levels in Commercial e-Cigarettes. Chem Res Toxicol. 2020;33(2):657-88.

Royal College of Physicians. Nicotine without smoke: Tobacco harm reduction. RCP. 2016.

Royal College of General Practitioners. Position statement on the use of electronic nicotine vapour products (e-cigarettes). RCGP. 2017.

Public Health England. Health matters: stopping smoking - what works? Public Health England. 2019.

Institute of Medicine (US) Scientific standards for studies on modified risk tobacco products. National Academies Press. 2012;370.

Cahours X, Prasad, K. A Review of Electronic Cigarette Use Behaviour Studies. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung International/Contributions to Tobacco Res. 2018;28:81-92.

Farsalinos K, Poulas K, Voudris V. Changes in Puffing Topography and Nicotine Consumption Depending on the Power Setting of Electronic Cigarettes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(8):993-7.

Robinson RJ, Hensel EC. Behavior-based yield for electronic cigarette users of different strength eliquids based on natural environment topography. Inhal Toxicol. 2019;31(13-14):484-91.

Jones J, Slayford S, Gray A. A cross-category puffing topography, mouth level exposure and consumption study among Italian users of tobacco and nicotine products. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1-11.

Vansickel AR, Edmiston JS, Liang Q, Duhon C, Connell C, Bennett D et al. Characterization of puff topography of a prototype electronic cigarette in adult exclusive cigarette smokers and adult exclusive electronic cigarette users. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018;98:250-56.

Lee YO, Nonnemaker JM, Bradfield B, Hensel EC, Robinson RJ. Examining Daily Electronic Cigarette Puff Topography Among Established and Nonestablished Cigarette Smokers in their Natural Environment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(10):1283-8.

Behar RZ, Hua M, Talbot, P. Puffing topography and nicotine intake of electronic cigarette users. PLoS One 2015;10(2):e0117222.

Cunningham A. Development and validation of a device to measure e-cigarette users’ topography. Sci Rep. 2016;6:35071.

CORESTA. No. 81- Routine analytical machine for e-cigarette aerosol generation and collection - definitions and standard conditions. CORESTA. Paris. 2015.

Spindle TR, Breland AB, Karaoghlanian NV, Shihadeh AL, Eissenberg T. Preliminary results of an examination of electronic cigarette user puff topography: the effect of a mouthpiece-based topography measurement device on plasma nicotine and subjective effects. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2015;17(2):142-9.

Kosmider L, Jackson A, Leigh N, O'Connor R, Goniewicz ML. Circadian Puffing Behavior and Topography Among E-cigarette Users. Tob Regul Sci. 2018;4(5):41-9.

Kimber CF, Soar K, Dawkins LE. Changes in puffing topography and subjective effects over a 2-week period in e-cigarette naïve smokers: Effects of device type and nicotine concentrations. Addict Behav. 2021;118:106909.

Dawkins M. ‘Real-world’ compensatory behaviour with low nicotine concentration e-liquid: subjective effects and nicotine, acrolein and formaldehyde exposure. Addiction. 2018;113:1874-82.

Hiler M. Electronic cigarette user plasma nicotine concentration, puff topography, heart rate, and subjective effects: Influence of liquid nicotine concentration and user experience. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;25(5):380-92.

Blank MD, Pearson J, Cobb CO, Felicione NJ, Hiler MM, Spindle TR, Breland A. What factors reliably predict electronic cigarette nicotine delivery? Tob Control. 2020;29(6):644-51.

Hiler M. Effects of electronic cigarette heating coil resistance and liquid nicotine concentration on user nicotine delivery, heart rate, subjective effects, puff topography, and liquid consumption. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2020;28(5):527-39.

Poynton S. A novel hybrid tobacco product that delivers a tobacco flavour note with vapour aerosol (Part 1): Product operation and preliminary aerosol chemistry assessment. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017;106:522-12.

Slayford SJ, Frost BE. A device to measure a smoker’s puffing topography and real-time puff-by-puff “tar” delivery. Beiträge Tabakforschung/Contrib Tob Res. 2014;26:74-84.

UK Government. E-cigarettes: regulations for consumer products. London: UK Government. 29 February 2016. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/e-cigarettes-regulations-for-consumer-products.Accessed on 25 October, 2020.

Hensel EC. Framework to estimate total particulate mass and nicotine delivered to e-cig users from natural environment monitoring data. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):8752.

McAdam K. Influence of machine-based puffing parameters on aerosol and smoke emissions from next generation nicotine inhalation products. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2019;101:156-65.

Gee J. Assessment of tobacco heating product THP1.0. Part 8: Study to determine puffing topography, mouth level exposure and consumption among Japanese users. Reg Tox Pharm. 2018;93:84-91.

Talih S, Balhas Z, Eissenberg T, Salman R, Karaoghlanian N, El Hellani A et al. Effects of user puff topography, device voltage, and liquid nicotine concentration on electronic cigarette nicotine yield: measurements and model predictions. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(2):150-7.

Robinson RJ, Eddingsaas NC, DiFrancesco AG, Jayasekera S, Hensel EC Jr. A framework to investigate the impact of topography and product characteristics on electronic cigarette emissions. PLoS One. 2018;13(11):e0206341.

Perfetti TA, Coleman WM III, Smith WS. Determination of mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke components for cigarettes of different tobacco type of reference cigarettes. Beiträge zur Tabakforschung Int. 1998;18(3):95-113.

Farsalinos KE, Romagna G, Tsiapras D, Kyrzopoulos S, Spyrou A, Voudris V. Impact of flavour variability on electronic cigarette use experience: an internet survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10:7272-82.

Russell C, McKeganey N, Dickson T, Nides M. Changing patterns of first e-cigarette flavor used and current flavors used by 20,836 adult frequent e-cigarette users in the USA. Harm Reduction J. 2018;15:33.

Chen JC. Flavored E-cigarette Use and Cigarette Smoking Reduction and Cessation-A Large National Study among Young Adult Smokers. Substance Use Misuse. 2018;53:2017-31.

Gravely S. The Association of E-cigarette Flavors With Satisfaction, Enjoyment, and Trying to Quit or Stay Abstinent From Smoking Among Regular Adult Vapers From Canada and the United States: Findings From the 2018 ITC Four Country Smoking and Vaping Survey. Nicotine Tobacco Res. 2020;22:1831-41.

Friedman AS, Xu S. Associations of Flavored E-Cigarette Uptake With Subsequent Smoking Initiation and Cessation. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(6):e203826.

McNeill A, Brose LS, Calder R, Simonavicius E, Robson D. Vaping in England: An evidence update including vaping for smoking cessation, February 2021: a report commissioned by Public Health England. London: Public Health England. 2021.